FACT CHECK: What They Are Saying About Costs
Posted by The Campaign on March 16, 2010 at 5:00 PM
Uwe Reinhardt, economist, Princeton University:
“What really drives it is the cost trend of health care, which is composed in part of utilization and in part of prices.” (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Insurers alone can’t be blamed for rates, economists say, 03/13/10)
Mort Kondracke, Roll Call:
“CMS figures show that insurance costs closely track the underlying — and surging — costs for hospitals, doctors and drugs. National health spending rose a whopping 5.7 percent in 2009, according to a February CMS report, and the ‘primary drivers’ were a 5.9 percent increase in hospital costs, a 5.2 percent increase for drugs and 6.3 percent for physician care. Insurance company administrative costs were not even mentioned as a driver — they dropped 2 percent last year — and abundant evidence indicates that industry profit margins run 3 percent to 4 percent, compared with 20 percent for drug companies and an average 13 percent for the health care industry.” (Roll Call, Will Democrats Fare Worse With or Without Passing Obamacare?, 03/11/10)
Robert Samuelson, The Washington Post:
“Whatever their sins, insurers are mainly intermediaries; they pass along the costs of the delivery system. In 2009, the largest 14 insurers had profits of roughly $9 billion; that approached 0.4 percent of total health spending of $2.472 trillion. This hardly explains high health costs. What people need to know is that Obama's plan evades health care’s major problems and would worsen the budget outlook. It’s a big new spending program when government hasn’t paid for the spending programs it already has.” (The Washington Post, Obama’s illusions of cost-control, 03/15/10)
“The big problem is uncontrolled spending, which prices people out of the market and burdens government budgets. Obama claims his proposal checks spending. Just the opposite. When people get insurance, they use more health services. Spending rises.” (The Washington Post, Obama’s illusions of cost-control, 03/15/10)
Dr. JudyAnn Bigby, secretary of the Executive Office of Health and Human Services:
“So much of what drives costs now is the revenue that hospitals want to generate.” (The Boston Globe, Insurer details its unequal payments, 03/16/10)
USA Today:
“As the debate reaches the endgame, here are five ways the final product could be better: -- Go after costs. The biggest void in the legislation is any major effort to control medical inflation…” (USA Today, Our view on medical reform: Five ways to improve the health care hybrid, 03/16/10)
Doug Schoen, Democratic Pollster:
“The data has been clear since at least the summer about how the American people feel about health insurance and their fears about the scope of government and the cost of this initiative. They would like greater focus on cost than any other goal.” (Politico, The handwriting on the wall, 03/15/10)
San Diego Union-Tribune:
“Another factor that has barely been debated is also sure to inflate premium costs…because the annual fine for refusing to buy health insurance is only up to $750 or 2 percent of income, whichever is greater, millions of Americans would pass on coverage, aware they could readily get insurance if facing a major medical problem. This ‘free riding’ means honest citizens would have to pick up the tab for those who game the system.” (San Diego Union-Tribune, Health Reform Bill Fails Two Tests, 03/16/10)
The Wall Street Journal:
“Above all other reasons, voters who oppose ObamaCare cite their fear over costs: They think it will cause their insurance premiums to soar and result in far higher taxes to fund a vast new entitlement.” (The Wall Street Journal, The Cost-Control Illusion, 03/13/10)
Richard Lord, Associated Industries of Massachusetts:
“You have to address the underlying medical costs.” (The Boston Herald, Business group backs health-care price caps, 03/11/10)
